Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
I still don't follow this postulate. The planets and stars could exist even if life existed nowhere. Therefore, the entire science of biology could be excised from the universe and the universe would be pretty much like you observe it through your telescope.

However, if you withdrew the laws of physics, everything changes. Nothing is possible as we now see it or understand it.

Evolution could be totally disproved without upsetting the laws of the universe as we know them. This to me indicates that biology is a mere subset of the truth- not the complete picture. I just don't see what biology has to do with this big planet we have found.

I guess I'm just stupid.

157 posted on 07/03/2003 5:21:11 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Prodigal Son
biology is a mere subset of the truth

It's a level of complexity. There is lower complexity--chemicals and rock, and there is higher complexity--behavior and society. The laws of physics operate on the very lowest levels and on every level all the way up in some manner. It's not going to

165 posted on 07/03/2003 5:33:50 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson