Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jack Welch Settles His Divorce Case on Eve of Trial
Bloomberg, no url | 7/3/3

Posted on 07/03/2003 10:05:38 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker

July 3 (Bloomberg) -- Jack Welch, who was General Electric

Co.'s chief executive for 21 years, has settled his contested

divorce case on the eve of a scheduled trial.

     Terms of the settlement were confidential. Welch, who retired

from General Electric in 2001, was to go to trial in divorce court

in Bridgeport, Connecticut, on Monday.

     ''Jack and Jane Beasley Welch have settled their matter

effective immediately and are now divorced,'' said a press release

issued by attorneys for both parties.

     The contentious case led to disclosure of Welch's retirement

package and prompted the cancellation, at Welch's request, of most

of his fringe benefits. General Electric was criticized for

lavishing him with cars, an apartment on Manhattan's Central Park

West and tickets for sporting events. The company also covered his

country club fees and expenses for food, wine and laundry.

     An attorney for Jack Welch, Daniel K. Webb, said that

Superior Court Judge Edgar W. Bassick III approved the divorce

agreement after a 20-minute hearing today in Bridgeport at which

both Welch and his wife were present.

     ''They are divorced, and the trial that was scheduled to

start this coming Monday is now canceled,'' Webb said. ''The terms

are confidential and the parties have agreed to have no further

comment.''

     An attorney for Jane Beasley Welch, Morton Marvin, declined

to comment. Another of her attorneys, William Zabel, could not be

reached for comment.

     The Welches were married for 13 years. Jack Welch filed for

divorce in April 2002 after public disclosure of his affair with

former Harvard Business Review editor Suzy Wetlaufer.


                       Perks Disclosed


     Welch agreed to pay for company-provided services after they

were disclosed. He valued them at as much as $2.5 million a year.

Welch may be the first high-profile retired executive to give up

and even pay for such benefits. Under a modified contract, Welch

said he would continue to get only the secretarial and office

services traditionally given retired chairmen.

     The Welches also sparred over the value of Jack Welch's

fortune. In November, Welch offered his wife a settlement proposal

that might amount to as much as $140 million, the New York Post

reported.

     Zabel dismissed the offer as akin to a pension and said

Welch's affidavit of his assets understated their value by more

than $100 million. Welch said in the affidavit that his assets

total $456.2 million and that his after-tax income from his

pension, consulting work, investment income and Social Security is

more than $1.4 million a month.

     While the settlement was being negotiated, Welch paid his

wife $35,000 a month in temporary support.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: lifestylesof; richandfamous
Obnoxious folks like him make honest capitalists look bad.
1 posted on 07/03/2003 10:05:38 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Divorce between rich people can get ugly! I know (via a friend) a local woman who was divorced by her husband (a successful doctor). He traded her in for the requisite trophy wife. If that wasn't enough, he had written into the divorce decree as part of the settlement that $6,000 (of her settlement) had to be spent every month on clothes! She'd take very expensive stuff, tags still on, every month to one of those high-end resale places to try to recoup some of her settlement money! True story.
2 posted on 07/03/2003 10:13:04 AM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
What is it you don't like about Jack Welch?
3 posted on 07/03/2003 10:13:31 AM PDT by bayareablues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Should have settled this a year ago.
4 posted on 07/03/2003 10:18:37 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
What did she do to deserve $140 million?
5 posted on 07/03/2003 10:19:17 AM PDT by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
What did she do to deserve $140 million?

She put up with a lying cheating jerk for 13 years.

6 posted on 07/03/2003 10:23:09 AM PDT by texgal (end no-fault and return DUE PROCESS to our courts))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: texgal
What did she do to deserve $140 million?

She put up with a lying cheating jerk for 13 years.

For that she should at least get to be a senator.

7 posted on 07/03/2003 10:26:45 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (I know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
I used to live in Fairfield,CT, home of Jack Welch and headquarters of GE. His obnoxiousness and SOB attitude were equal in stature to that of Martha Stewart herself, another denizen of these parts.

Here's my very favorite Jack story:

In Fairfield, at the end of a country road and by the edge of Long Island Sound, is a primo-exclusive golf club, populated only by old-money CT bluebloods. 200 members, tops. Everybody wants to play golf there because outside of Scotland, there are very few true, seaside, "links" type courses, and this is one of them. Jack wanted to play there. Badly.

Not bleeding blue enough, Jack was denied membership, despite his bazillions. After all, he worked for a living.

So, Jack bought the property next to the top of the club's driveway, thinking to impress the members, and built a gorgeous, mega-million dollar home there, beautifying the property, and increasing the appeal of the club.

Every day thereafter, the members would wave to Jack as they drove past his mansion. This was 15 years go. He's still not a member.

8 posted on 07/03/2003 10:38:33 AM PDT by Ol' Sox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayareablues
Welch's over-the-top comp package, combined with his exhibitionistic extra-marital activities, provided rhetorical amunition for the "tax the immoral rich" crowd.

GE was fully within its rights to pay him as they did, and lord knows Jack's marriage is his own business, but in the context of his enormous ongoing PR/ego/self-stroking machine, the combination was a PR disaster that made it easier for the enemies of free enterprise to smear decent capitalists.

9 posted on 07/03/2003 10:38:47 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sox
Great story. Seems the club made the right decision, too.
10 posted on 07/03/2003 10:40:12 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sox

"I don't want to belong to a club that will accept me as a memember" - Groucho Marx

11 posted on 07/03/2003 10:46:16 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: texgal
She put up with a lying cheating jerk for 13 years.

She was cheating as well, maybe even more than him.

12 posted on 07/03/2003 10:53:08 AM PDT by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Shoud have settled a year ago? The lawyers wouldn't like that! After all, they have overhead. And they have their own divorce settlements to pay for.
13 posted on 07/03/2003 10:53:29 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VoiceOfBruck
She put up with a lying cheating jerk for 13 years. For that she should at least get to be a senator.

LOL

14 posted on 07/03/2003 10:56:17 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Another of her attorneys, William Zabel, could not be reached for comment

He was out on his new yacht...

15 posted on 07/03/2003 10:59:02 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
I'm sure it was a very good deal for the Mrs. [or ex-Mrs.]

And it sound like she had good representation.

Like they say, a good lawyer only negociates on the steps of the courthouse.
16 posted on 07/03/2003 11:21:04 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Robert ("The Bum") Palmer only got $ 52 million for putting Digital Equipment Corp. out of business and putting over 100,000 people out of work. If I were Palmer, I'd sue for a better settlement.
17 posted on 07/03/2003 12:10:53 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson