Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: evad
Subsequently I saw that Howard Dean supported the idea of sending troops to Liberia, which sharply reduced my confidence even further that this move promotes a vital interest of the United States.
41 posted on 07/02/2003 5:19:48 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: kesg
..which sharply reduced my confidence even further that this move promotes a vital interest of the United States.

When that confidence level drops to ZERO, then you'll be at my level.

Even the slixter in Bosnia/Serbia went under the pretense of vital national interest. Bush in Kuwait under the vital interest of oil stability.

Whether these interests are real or perceived we can debate, but.... LIBERIA. What national interest do we have there?

Now if we want to sent humanitarian aid, that's something else althought I personally would take the position that some type of interest or gain to us must be a part of the package.

45 posted on 07/02/2003 6:09:21 PM PDT by evad (Hitlary..lying..It's WHAT she does, it's ALL she does and she WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson