Replies

And yet women who have no children to raise, socks to sew, or meals to cook Still get half everthing. Try again.

Most women today aren't the model homemakers you describe, and men today are just as likely to change diapers, coach, do housework and prepare meals. Its 2003 FCOL-"for cying out loud."

I know most women today aren't like the homemakers I grew up with. Those long-ago women are the women I'm talking about, and the wrongs done to them have, I still feel, contributed largely to the animosity women feel toward men, which animosity feminism exploits.

But I don't know if your description is any more apt. In 2003, I don't know a single soul who divorced a stay-at-home, childless woman who refuses to go out and get a job and who got a sweet alimony deal out of it. Unless it's Ivana Trump, and didn't they have a child? I don't remember....

male homemakers do not get the same consideration. In court they will STILL loose the children STILL have to get a job to pay for HER to put the children in daycare.

This is real easy. Gentlemen if you place a personal ad just add the notation: FNNA Feminists need not apply.

Feminist Career women just are not the type of marriage material suitable for families. PC culture indoctrinates MEN must accomodate but women should not. NO thank you, real marriage requires the abilty for compromise by BOTH parties.

Marriage was and IS empowering to the right couples in the past and the present. I see the attack on beneficial gender rolls as part of the deterioration of marriage. I you cant "be a man" in a marriage why should any male marry? (you don't go where you are not wanted or needed)

Do these young women in college today even understand a Gentlman opening the door for a lady? Confuse a college girl, get her chair at a nice restaurant. (Do mother's even teach manners to children any more? Fathers?)