Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
and those in which a State shall be Party

If you look at the case title, the state of Alabama is not a party to the action. Chief Judge Roy Moore is. Had Alabama been the party, the US Supreme Court would've heard this first, not last, in the appeals process.

405 posted on 07/02/2003 8:16:29 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
My point is that the Constitution overtly establishes that the Supreme Court is not the final arbiter of all. Congress by any law can limit it in some cases. ---the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

Here is a link to the decision. D. C. Docket Nos. 01-01268-CV-T-N 01-01269-CV-T-N

419 posted on 07/02/2003 8:37:01 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
P.S. I was wrong about the parties. They were all individuals and the United States was not a party.
421 posted on 07/02/2003 8:43:11 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson