Straw man argument. I am a member of a religious minority and I welcome display of the 10 Commandments. It is an historical document, intrinsic to the fouding of this country, and I am not offended in the least by it. You're dragging in Popes, and Baptists, and what not. This is silly and has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.
With all due respect, so what? I'm not offended by it, either.
Constitutionality is not dependent on what does or does not offend you. The court here specifically addressed that issue and found that the display did offend the plaintiffs.