[Kevin Curry]

Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy.

[TheCrusader]

"Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy."

This would be considered as "art", and protected under the First Amendment. Freedom of Speech for Christians isn't allowed.

[sport]

Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy

Or two men engaged in oral sex, of better yet a man giving oral sex to a male child.

This would warm the cockles of every alcu member's heart.

[zip]

Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy.

SCOTUS would approve it 5 to 4.

We are sure leaving our children a wonderful world. </sarcasm off.

[dogbyte12]

Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy.

Whatever Kevin. Full blown hysterics doesn't help much does it? A Buddhist lawyer or a Hindu defendent might feel that by the court's endorsement of the 10 commandments, it is prejudicial against them or their clients.

A juror walks into the building, sees the religious monument, and then sees a defendant of a different faith, and a connection is made subconsciously, that the fellow is guilty, because he worships one of these heathen religions.

Nobody is stopping Alabaman's from worshipping God, the courts just don't like the undue influence this has on potential jurors who might take the person's faith in mind more readily, with the religious reminder of their faith when they enter the court house.

Oh.. but it is much more fun to run around and talk about statues of sodomites. Statues of Krishna is more apropos. Would you feel comfortable in a courthouse, where the population to begin with was mostly Hindu, you were accused of committing a crime against a Hindu, and the judge has placed a shrine to Krishna or Shiva in full view of the jury? Think outside the box. It works.

[DannyTN]

"Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy. "

Failure to replace it with such a statue would be deemed discriminatory.

Maybe that is what the good Judge ought to replace it with. That would be a monument to the Supreme Court's decision. A monument to what they have embraced over what they have rejected.

[microgood]

Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy.

Good idea. Mine is to put a bust of each of the 11 Circuit Judges that voted for this and their full names and then something really, really insulting. Wouldn't that be covered by the 1st Amendment. Maybe the ACLU would defend that one for us.

[takenoprisoner]

That'd be Kevin and his lover?

[Revel]

I believe it was always intended by a most of our founders that the "Ultimate Law" was that of our christian God. Not that we have to have a church of england or a baptist, or Catholic(ect...) National religion, but that our country is still to based on Christian laws. If a person has not conscience of right and wrong before God and if they believe in no accountability before God then no amount of laws will make the world a safe and loving place. Because why would anyone care about anyone but themselve's? The only punishment in mans law is getting caught. If you belive in God's law then you will always get caught and someday answer to it. By taking God out of everything then you end up with people with no heart and no conscience. You end up with the mess in society that we have today. As we move closer and closer to this Godless society then only one thing is ceartin. We will be doomed by our own actions even if there were no judgement from God. Our country depended on that fabric...it will not survive without it. The courts in the past upheld these principles with that in mind. Not any more. No conjured up legal argument can change that basic fact. But if people don't have that in there hearts any longer then they will be doomed to do exactly what they are doing. Defending there conjured up arguments based not on what our country must have to survive, but on what they percive to be there very clever interpretations.

[PatrioticAmerican]

"Now to replace it with a statue of two men engaged in anal sodomy. "

Of a young buy wearing a Boy Scout uniform.



It seems our religion is once again under attack.

[longtermmemmory]

they would celebrate you choice of "diversity"