To: Lurking Libertarian
24 posted on
07/01/2003 3:27:15 PM PDT by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
He's a moron. A dolt. An idiot.
Its farcical that he even defended it that way. And he is Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court???????
To: Catspaw
From the printed decision, it appears that the court establishes the following:
- The wording in the Constitution isn't what matters. What matters is what other people have decided the Constitution should have said.
- The judge writing the decision is highly offended by any suggestion that there is a God whose laws were used as foundations for US law. Read Nebechednezzer.
- The discomfort caused by a godless lawyer's conscience can be appeased by destroying anything that would remind said lawyer that there is such a thing as good and evil.
- The fact that Martin Luther King's speech could not be seen from the spot where the Ten Commandments were placed was evidence that King is considered a mere human and not God. The fact that the Commandment statue could not be seen from the King plaque was evidence of nothing.
617 posted on
07/03/2003 4:08:51 PM PDT by
gitmo
(We've left the slippery slope and we are now in free fall.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson