That's what it sounds like to me.
The shallowness of comprehension on this issue is astounding. Don't you people understand that this Judge openly states that he put up this monument to further the influence of Christianity on the operation of the law in his court? That's not what I say - that's what HE says. Do you people really believe that the Constitution endorses a theocracy?
Words mean things. Yesterday (or was it the day before? It's so exciting at FR!) someone posted the exact meaning of theocracy. Essentially it means rule by unelected CLERICS, PRIESTS or other offical religous dudes. It does NOT mean that judges or elected officials cannot be informed by religion.