Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
Tell me the full facts. While law, even constitutional law, is about principles, facts play a very important role.

I'm not sure what facts you need, the question is a simple one.

Is it your understanding that the first amendment prohibits religious displays on public property?

130 posted on 07/01/2003 5:35:00 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
I'm not sure what facts you need, the question is a simple one.

You're the one who mentioned a fellow, so you introduced a fact situation. I'm not sure why you're refusing to expound.

And I did give you an answer. Please read my response again.

135 posted on 07/01/2003 5:46:55 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07
I'll answer that one: no. But that's not what this case was about. Does the Constitution prohibit religious displays placed by the government for a strictly religious purpose, limited to a single religion to the exclusion of others? Yes. And that is exactly what Judge Moore said he was doing.

Just read the case. Why are so many compelled to spout off about things they know nothing about?

168 posted on 07/01/2003 6:59:55 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson