Well, I thought I had made it earlier in the thread, so I guess I was trying to avoid repeating myself.
Have you read the actual opinion?
Yes, I've read it. The court's lame attempt to distinguish this from the "In God We Trust" on our money is utterly unconvincing. They basically were trying to say that we really don't mean what we say on the money - it's just window dressing. Sounds like an atheist in denial to me.
There is no substantive difference between what appears on our coins and the Decalogue in that rotunda. They both express the exact same worldview.