Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ken5050
The only reason to buy SALN would be to tweak the liberals, which is not really worth the time or money, so I was not being too serious, but didn't put a sarcasm tag on it.

Looking at the price chart in post #11, their share price fell below 1$ per share in mid 2001, even with their reverse split. Why did the NASDAQ delay delisting them until Feb 2003? This seems analagous to networks still carrying WNBA games, even though they would probably get better ratings by showing "Gilligan's Island" re-runs

22 posted on 07/01/2003 12:16:36 PM PDT by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: eeman
I didn't take it as a sarcastic comment...there was considerable serious discussion here on several threads....the biggest problem to a take over is that much of the stock is closely held..it's a thin float..you couldn't buy enough to get control.....

The Nasdaq has shamefully delayed delisting many companies, because then you'd be able to print their stock tables on the back of a 3 x 5 index card....

23 posted on 07/01/2003 12:26:35 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson