Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scenic Sounds
There will even be a confused few who, like TLB, will vote for Bush because they have somehow convinced themselves that "a vote for Bush is a vote for socialism."

"Confused"? No rational being can deny that a vote for Bush in 2000 was a vote for socialism. He did not run on a platform of shrinking government programs. He didn't even run on the status quo. He came out on favor of expanding Medicare.

We are mired in socialism, and getting deeper with each passing administration. Neither of the two parties is going to nominate anyone who'll dare change that direction. The reality is, a vote for anyone other than Bush was at least in effect a vote for even more socialism under President Gore.

If anyone's "confused," it's those who have somehow convinced themselves that Bush or any major party candidate has the intestinal fortitude to reverse our socialist course.

120 posted on 07/01/2003 10:32:50 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer
I love your tag line. ;-)

So, who do you anticipate you'll be voting for in November, 2004?

125 posted on 07/01/2003 10:36:51 AM PDT by Scenic Sounds (Summertime!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
Democrat Dr. Ruth Campaigns for Bush

http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/1/103428

136 posted on 07/01/2003 10:54:06 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (The Gift is to See the Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson