[jla]

And in fairness, it could very well be some other chicken plant in Arkansas.

Could be.
But I can't help to wonder why the co.'s name wasn't used, as is the case with the "eminent scientist from New York" whose testimony so proved the chicken catcher's innocence that he pled, and was found guilty, of sexual abuse. (a moment o'victory in H's ethically-warped mind)

[Mia T]

Chk hillary's account. The expert witness didn't prove the rapist INNOCENT. He merely injected confusion into the mix, a la Barry Scheck of the OJ outrage.

Expert-witnessdom is an industry unto itself and many--if not most--expert witnesses sell their souls without giving it a second thought.

I actually had the opportunity to impeach a renowned cardiologist and author of the seminal text on heart disease WITH MATERIAL FROM HIS OWN TEXT, which he, of course, was disinclined to refute. ;)