Time after time people bring cases that go to the surpreme court based on what the constitution says in the matter. As we have learned once again that is a dumb thing to do. If one wants to predict the outcome of a Supreme Court Case one should never ask what the law or Constitution says. Those Documents are worhtless predictors. The only question is are their 5 votes on the court to support a case. If there are not it does not matter what the constitution says. It matters what the judges say.
I see you're one of those people whose posts I'm going to have to avoid, so that I don't end up eating the business end of a .38.
"Constitution? We don't need no steenkin' Constitution!"
I did not say we don't need one. I said we don't have a constitution whose words mean anything to the people that are charged with interpreting it.