[wcbtinman]

I responded to your thought that it was too difficult or dangerous to take on the govt, in a military fashion. I didn't advocate violence, or the overthrow of the govt, just outlined some possibilities and current news that would give food for thought and discussion.

That post, #177 was removed by one of the moderators, for reasons not explained.

In light of that, I would only ask this: If the possibility, the tactics, and methods of armed revolt is something not to be discussed among us, then why do we have the 2nd amendment?(or the 1st for that matter) I would much rather discuss such things in an open forum where it's somewhat possible that such ideas could get back to the govt and be heeded as a warning, than to wait and cower quietly until it is no longer possible to stop an open and bloody revolt.

But, I guess that some of the 'conservatives' around here are just gutless cowards..

[Past Democrat]

Was that the post were you stated 3%=9,000,000 snippers.