Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
As my coach used to tell me, don't assume anything...

While states are required to extend full faith and credit to the laws of other states, the states have always been able to disregard marriages from other states that are against the public policy of their state. So, particularly after DOMA, one state can't force others to allow gay marriage. And if some court tried to overturn DOMA, as I have noted above, DOMA should be made an amendment to the Constitution. But the gibberish proposed above should not.
61 posted on 06/30/2003 3:38:50 PM PDT by ChicagoGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: ChicagoGuy
Okay, you at least recognize the very possible need for a constitutional amendment. The difference is that you think each state should be able to decide for itself whether or not to recognize homosexual marriage.
73 posted on 06/30/2003 3:46:59 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson