Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Snuffington
And since the state was the reason the Church became a mere formality in this issue, it's hardly proper for the state to abandon what it usurped and then blame the Church when it doesn't turn out so well.

So your argument is:

1. The state usurped the institution of marriage from the Church, where it rightfully belongs
2. The state devalued the meaning of marriage
3. The state should continue to license this activity

That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

450 posted on 07/01/2003 4:30:50 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
2. The state devalued the meaning of marriage

That's not part of my argument. So far, I don't hold the state responsible for the devaluation of marriage. Let them start passing laws trying to redefine it (e.g. gay marriage, and I'll quickly change my opinion.

471 posted on 07/01/2003 8:39:31 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson