Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
I've been thinking about it and trying to come up with something consistent with my views all the way around.

My post was only partially in jest but thinking about it on the way home from the Big Apple tonight, I think the best thing would be language that limited the power of that branch of government commonly known as SCOTUS while acknowledging that tenth amendment issues are the province of the states and the people occupying them.

The fly in the ointment is exactly what you pointed out. I am concerned that an ultra minority, eg a small state, can decide the issue for the entire country on it's own through that full faith and credit thingamabob.

You're task, if you decide to accept, would be to come up with precise language that would satisfy both you and the social troglodyte, that's me.:-}

Good luck!

288 posted on 06/30/2003 7:20:41 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: Sabretooth
Toothe,

Thoughts on 284 and 288?

289 posted on 06/30/2003 7:22:08 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07; Torie
Would this work?

Marriage in the United States and in each State shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.

305 posted on 06/30/2003 7:49:13 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson