Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ex-snook
a remedy is needed to reassert the separation of functions if the SC oversteps by making laws or usurps State decisions.

In that case, introduce an ammendment that will solve the problem of the usurption of States' Rights. You can not remedy a problem by compounding it.

I guess it is a question of priority. Which is more important to you? Controlling how other people use their genitals or the restoration of States' Rights? (The question is rhetorical. Your choice is obvious.)

254 posted on 06/30/2003 6:16:08 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Gordon
"Controlling how other people use their genitals or the restoration of States' Rights? "

With respect I am not addressing either. I am addressing restoring the checks and balances intended. SC overreaching can intrude on both Congress and the States.

It's not about genitals although that may be the straw that broke the camel's back. IMHO the SC went over the line in Roe v Wade by removing the issue from voters If this could be accomplished with one amendment then fine.

Ending Prohibition by allowing States to set their own liquor laws has worked. That seems to be a successful model to be restored.

467 posted on 07/01/2003 7:49:48 AM PDT by ex-snook (Who recovers in a 'jobless recovery'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson