[Sam Cree]

Yeah, it sounds like what is supposed to be states stuff to me.

Which probably means the Supreme Court's decision wasn't constitutional either.

[ChicagoGuy]

"Which probably means the Supreme Court's decision wasn't constitutional either." I would fully support an amendment to the constitution saying that the states may decide whether or not sodomy may be prohibited for all its citizens. But the amendment that is proposed above is a gross usurpation of the states' traditional bailiwick.