Define "not"
It would be impossible for any State that cannot put up the common sense backbone to publicly declare in law that sex with animals unacceptable to be anything but currently in social anarchy.
Does that mean that the state is viably ripping itself apart, not necessarily. Or better yet, not definably related to this lack of recognizable standards.
I understand your point being that I am afraid of alittle sexual freedom. Its not fear, in fact what you are encouraging is fear, fear to call a spade a spade. I mean look at you, this sophist reasoning has you rationalizing like a liberal-for the legitimacy of having an orgasm in an animal! Before this ruling I would have found your comments rather funny, because of this precident its now become all too serious.