[Your Nightmare]

Nothing like using ones own words to illustrate a point! Touchee'[sic]

Wow, you really got me there. You say "why don't you read Coulter's book" and I say "because I don't like her" and you accuse me of "shooting the messenger". There are other sources of information out there, you know. And some of them aren't full of personal insults and hyperbole.

[demkicker]

Wow, you really got me there. You say "why don't you read Coulter's book" and I say "because I don't like her" and you accuse me of "shooting the messenger".

Sorry, but the truth hurts. You're trying to change the subject by whining that I'm accusing you of shooting the messenger. You are! You don't believe Ann Coulter's account of what transpired during the "McCarthy era", correct? You stated that you don't want to read her book, Treason (regardless of her well documented facts) because "you can't stand Ann Coulter".

Psssst... it is quite obvious you are too emotional to make a rational decision about what happened in the McCarthy era because you won't even consider Coulter's account. You are indeed shooting the messenger because of your personal 'feelings'.

There are other sources of information out there, you know. And some of them aren't full of personal insults and hyperbole.

I just love it when people like you illustrate absurdity by being absurd. You rant about your dislike for Ann Coulter and say you will not read her book, but have to get your little dig in by saying her book is "full of personal insults and hyperbole."

So, you know what her book is "full of", even though you won't read it. Sorry, but you don't qualify as an objective critic. In fact, the more you say about this topic, the less credibility you have. Quit digging a deeper hole. Give it up already...

[ought-six]

If you won't read Coulter's book, then read her sources, as identified in her footnotes and bibliography.