To: solomangrundy
"Why do heterosexuals have to shove their illicit activities in everyone's face all the time?" You make a valid point, but then I would have to say that those who are adamantly opposed to widespread acceptance of homosexuality are also opposed to the EQUALLY deplorable display of heterosexual immorality. Just because the latter is already out of control, why should we add another evil to the mix?
85 posted on
06/30/2003 8:44:53 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: sweetliberty
But the issue is, however, what is done in private. I don't advocate public indecency by anyone, straight or gay. I'm just as offended by extravagant displays of affection between gay people or straight people in public. But when two consenting adults love each other and want to express that love in the privacy of their home, I do not think it is anyone else's business, especially the government. And yes, I fully know that not every person's expression of sexual activity involves "love", but that goes for anyone, straight or gay, and I really don't want to know what is going on in my neighbor's bedroom.
Should law's punishing adultery or fornication be brought back? How about masturbation?
To: sweetliberty
"EQUALLY deplorable display of heterosexual immorality."
I was at my nephew's wedding when a couple went on to the dance floor and began, well, simulating sex as a 'dance'. I calmly interrupted them and told them to go get a room for that - there were kids here. They looked at me dumbfounded and sat down.
Holding hands, a brief kiss - no problem. Public immodesty, public sexual contact - not acceptable.
99 posted on
06/30/2003 9:11:12 AM PDT by
MEGoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson