Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RKV
Well- let's debate policy. I don't think our security is served very well by men who write:

Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.

That is just plain scary. It makes the "Best and Brightest" of Kennedy look like Taft isolationists.

19 posted on 06/30/2003 6:23:08 AM PDT by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Burkeman1
If by our example we threaten theocrats, dictators and statists (but I repeat myself), then I do not propose we change our behavior to ameliorate their concerns. I suspect we don't quite agree on whether or not the old order was a good thing. I do agree with you that we can live without another Kennedy (as far as foreign policy was concerned he was an unmittigated disaster).
21 posted on 06/30/2003 6:33:05 AM PDT by RKV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson