If heterosexual child molesters were subject to harsher penalties, I do not believe the Supreme Court would step in. I don't see how they could, under Lawrence. So this is one-way, discriminatory constitutional protection.
If heterosexual child molesters were subject to harsher penalties, I do not believe the Supreme Court would step in. Why not? I think they would.
So this is one-way, discriminatory constitutional protection.
So by equalizing the penalties applied to homosexuals and heterosexuals, we're discriminating? I must confess, this isn't making a whole lot of sense to me.