[First Amendment]

Amendments shouldn't be for trivial issues, but for the greatest good.

Right. Trivial petty stuff like families, childraising, stability, stable communities, kids having a mother and a father, silly useless stuff like that. Has little or no effect on the greatest good.

So is this sodomy decision for the greatest good? (I know it's not an amendment but it's going to force an amendment.)

[sasportas]

I agree with you.

If I understand FreeRepublic aright, this is supposed to be a conservative forum. Who on earth ARE these anti-family people posting on this thread? DU infiltrators? Liberaltarians? Compromisers? Dare I say it, are they themselves sodomites? Surely they don't fancy themselves conservatives!

By definition, they can't be. A conservative, if he is in fact one, would be fighting to conserve values conservatives have always stood for. Nothing is more basic to human society than one man, one woman.

As far as I am concerned this is the big one. Let the chips fall where they are going to fall. This has got me riled like nothing I have ever experienced. If we can't stand on the right side of this issue none of the rest even matters.

[DAnconia55]

So is this sodomy decision for the greatest good? (

Spoken like a true collectivist.