You have just contradicted yourself, my friend, because now you are saying it's ok to FORCE your belief of "human at conception" on those women that believe that it's not a human until it's born...thereby negating their rights to their beliefs.
You can't pick & choose what is morally acceptable to impose on people and what is not, per your libertarian creedo, you must allow everyone to choose what is right for themselves.
Again, the laws are there to protect us from ourselves and our illogical rationalization at time of crisis.
If they were doing it with their own bodies it would be called suicide. That I have no problem with. (But I'll bet you want a law against that too...)
You have just contradicted yourself, my friend, because now you are saying it's ok to FORCE your belief of "human at conception" on those women that believe that it's not a human until it's born...thereby negating their rights to their beliefs
(Really now, do try to keep up.... )
Life Exists and isn't debatable. I don't really CARE what their opinions are, because they are demonstrably wrong. A baby is a baby. And the moon isn't made of green cheese. And 2 men having sex in their own house isn't harming you.
You can't pick & choose what is morally acceptable to impose on people and what is not
To an extent you can. Force and Fraud. Outside of THAT, you're correct. I have no authority to 'impose' my will.
But I do have the authority to stop a mugger, or a rapist, or a thief. I DO NOT have the authority to stop a prostitute, or a drug user or a gambler.
And neither does government, because it has no powers that we don't have ourselves.
Morally at least. The problems come when you try to cheat reality. (Like banning gay men from having sex in their own homes.) You can make immoral laws, but you WILL pay the price for them....
Again, the laws are there to protect us from ourselves and our illogical rationalization at time of crisis
Nanny state nonsense.
Here's EXACTLY what I'm talking about. Click here