To: dubyaismypresident
Perhaps. However, can his party allow that?
Filibustering prescription drugs for the elderly, because he wants to make sure that the people he deems too rich for tax cuts, will get free drugs?
Also bearing in mind their Senatorial election landscape in 2004.
11 posted on
06/30/2003 11:46:40 AM PDT by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: hobbes1
Perhaps. However, can his party allow that? It's what Daschle wanted to do originally but backed off when Fat Ted decided to support it. Hillary! voted against the Senate version. I'm sure they can complain about it being a sop to the "big insurance companies" or a scheme to "make Medicare wither on the vine." Or they'll blame Tom Delay or something.
15 posted on
06/30/2003 11:50:53 AM PDT by
NeoCaveman
("I don't need the Bush tax cut. I never worked a f****** day in my life. Patrick Kennedy D-RI)
To: hobbes1
Good point about the inconsistency with tax cuts.
I read that in disbelief....I can't fathom why these morons are opposing giving less govt. help to the rich when they scream about tax cuts for the rich all the time.
Somebody help me out here.
28 posted on
06/30/2003 12:25:11 PM PDT by
rwfromkansas
("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson