Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
To what extent Reagan's "small government" philosophy was any more deeply-held than Bush's "compassionate conservatism" means little if the OUTCOMES are not much different. My point stands: on the issues where Reagan saw the writing on the wall, he punted. Bush has done the same thing, and I would too in his shoes.

Or, he could become a sacrificial lamb and all the conservatives would thump their chests, then whine about the next four years of Pres. Dean, followed by Pres. Clinton for eight. No thanks. I'll take pragmatism any day.

52 posted on 06/29/2003 5:36:00 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: LS
To what extent Reagan's "small government" philosophy was any more deeply-held than Bush's "compassionate conservatism" means little if the OUTCOMES are not much different.

The Dems held both houses of congress for most of Reagan's presidency. But "W" has no such excuse.

53 posted on 06/29/2003 7:00:07 PM PDT by xdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: LS
My point stands: on the issues where Reagan saw the writing on the wall, he punted. Bush has done the same thing, and I would too in his shoes.

GWB must be standing much closer to the wall.

54 posted on 06/29/2003 7:13:43 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson