To: Torie
The 2004 elections may very well not be about the economy on a nationwide level, but they will near certainly be about the economy in Washington State. In 2000, Washington had as low as 4.2% unemployment; in 2003, Washington currently has 7.3% unemployment (sorry, it's Oregon with 8.1%). Whatever the stock & real estate markets might do nationwide (within reason), it's not going to make much difference for Washington. (Seattle, BTW, is one of the few places that's experienced a real estate bust). We shall see.
86 posted on
06/28/2003 4:59:14 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
"it's not going to make much difference for Washington. (Seattle, BTW, is one of the few places that's experienced a real estate bust). We shall see."
I was under the impression that Gov Locke was taking most of the heat about the economy in Wa state.
87 posted on
06/28/2003 5:03:06 PM PDT by
Pubbie
(Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
To: AntiGuv
So why is the real estate market picking up in Oregon with an 8.1% employment rate? I know it is, because part of my real estate "empire" is in Portland. I will have to check realtor.com as to Seattle, and see what the asking prices at least are in the neighborhoods I once checked out in detail back when, and thus know well.
88 posted on
06/28/2003 5:03:29 PM PDT by
Torie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson