[eno_]

Polyamory is only slightly more esoteric than capital-L Libertarianism. They both get caught up in theory too much to have time left over for actual sex.

[colorado tanker]

I just don't see any distinction of gay sex from polyamorous sex under the Court's "fundamental right of humanity" or privacy or whatever they're going to call this new right of theirs. So, adultery laws are gone. I have no doubt state supreme courts will begin busily finding a "right" to gay marriage under this decision, as in Canada. All states will have to recognize those marriages under the full faith and credit clause. So, if marriage is no longer restricted to one man and one woman, by what principle will a court deny marriage to two men and a woman or two women and a man or whatever? There will be plenty of experts to testify that monogamy is "unnatural" and polyamorous people are "born" that way. "Paint your wagon and come along . . . ."