[dark_lord]

Yep. Now that some prisoners are now being released because of the idiot ruling, such as the guy doing a 15 year sentence for having homosexual sex with a boy of 14, we are just tickled pink. (Pardon the pun.) If it had been with a girl of 14, the law is quite clear. According to the Supremes, now it is okay for statutory rape agains someone of the same sex? The 6 justices who voted for this should be removed forcibly.

Two comments on this. The first is -- I find it amusing that the punishment for a guy that apparently likes to give oral sex to men is to be sent to prison. Talk about brother rabbit being tossed into the briar patch! The second things is -- in that state, oral sex on a 14 year old girl by a 17 year old guy would have been a maximum sentence of 3 years. This guy had already served 3 years. That is why he was let out.

[TommyDale]

"... I find it amusing that the punishment for a guy that apparently likes to give oral sex to men is to be sent to prison. "

The recipient of this pervert's unnatural affection was a 14 year old boy, not a man. And if it had been my 14 year old, the perpetrator would not have gone to prison -- I would have punished him personally. Use your imagination on that one.

[csvset]

Justices Void Prison Term Given Gay Teenager in Kansas

That case is on this thread. (For anyone who might not be familiar with it)

[muawiyah]

By a 17 year old is one thing; by an 18 year old is an entirely different manner, and this was by an adult, not a minor. The local prosecutor who put that guy in jail probably ought to be investigated. There are undoubtedly OTHER laws which could have been used to place and keep a pedophile in prison. After all, Kansas is the buckle on the Bible Belt and it's inconceivable they ever intended to assist pedophilia.