Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
Am I clear here? If you are a 18 year old male and you receive oral sex from a 14 year old girl you get 15 months, but from a 14 year old boy 17 years?

On it's face then, it is unconstitutional.

313 posted on 06/29/2003 1:15:56 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: dogbyte12; Torie
Am I clear here? If you are a 18 year old male and you receive oral sex from a 14 year old girl you get 15 months, but from a 14 year old boy 17 years?

Yep, you are clear. What the Kansas 'Romeo & Juliet' statute did was reduce the sentencing standards for oral sex in cases where the younger teenager is 14 to 16, the older teenager is under 19, the age difference between them is less than four years and there are no third parties involved, the maximum penalty is 15 months in prison. The rule simply wasn't applied in cases where the partners are of the same sex.

BTW, the 18 year old in this case didn't receive oral sex, he provided oral sex, if you catch my meaning....

317 posted on 06/29/2003 1:22:37 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson