Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
You keep repeating that falsehood after the error has been pointed out to you. You need to start backing this up. Not even the supreme court itself states that its interpretations are correct "by definition".

Try violating a decision of the Supreme Court, see what happens, and then tell me again their definitions carry no weight.

243 posted on 06/29/2003 8:10:59 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: jlogajan
Try violating a decision of the Supreme Court, see what happens, and then tell me again their definitions carry no weight.

Andrew Jackson did that once. Nothing much happened to him, though it should have for disobeying them. Talk to any Cherokee about "The Trail of Tears" and Andrew Jackson defying the courts ruling in Worcester vs Georgia in 1832.

244 posted on 06/29/2003 8:14:55 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
...and then tell me again their definitions carry no weight.

"Again"? When did I tell you this the first time?

Falsehoods can most certainly carry plenty of weight. How do you think the liberals have had such control over the media for so long?

246 posted on 06/29/2003 8:25:45 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson