To: inquest
You keep repeating that falsehood after the error has been pointed out to you. You need to start backing this up. Not even the supreme court itself states that its interpretations are correct "by definition". Try violating a decision of the Supreme Court, see what happens, and then tell me again their definitions carry no weight.
To: jlogajan
Try violating a decision of the Supreme Court, see what happens, and then tell me again their definitions carry no weight. Andrew Jackson did that once. Nothing much happened to him, though it should have for disobeying them. Talk to any Cherokee about "The Trail of Tears" and Andrew Jackson defying the courts ruling in Worcester vs Georgia in 1832.
To: jlogajan
...and then tell me again their definitions carry no weight."Again"? When did I tell you this the first time?
Falsehoods can most certainly carry plenty of weight. How do you think the liberals have had such control over the media for so long?
246 posted on
06/29/2003 8:25:45 AM PDT by
inquest
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson