Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides; wirestripper; AppyPappy
Linda Greenhouse is wrong. Period. Which partly explains why she's a journalist and not a lawyer. As this Washington Post article makes clear:

Gay Rights Ruling Affects Kan. Case

The Supreme Court announced yesterday the first ripple effect of its landmark decision on gay rights, ordering a Kansas court to reconsider its approval of a 17-year sentence meted out to an 18-year-old man for having consensual sex with a 14-year-old boy.

Without comment or published dissent, the court vacated the Kansas Court of Appeals' ruling last year that Matthew Limon's sentence was constitutional even though the same conduct between two persons of different sexes would have received a far lighter penalty under Kansas law.

In fact, as that excerpt makes clear, there was never even a slightest question of vacating the original conviction, because the Kansas ruling under appeal itself only dealt with the constitutionality of the sentence disparity. To reiterate yet again, the conviction has not been vacated no matter how many ways you figure out to suggest otherwise.

231 posted on 06/29/2003 6:48:17 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
Linda Greenhouse has been the New York Times's Supreme Court reporter for many years. Her husband is the distinguished Washington lawyer Eugene Fidel (who taught me at Yale Law School.)
235 posted on 06/29/2003 7:07:17 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson