[Skywalk]

Expecting many of the people on this site to be consistent?

Ain't gonna happen.

They'd much rather ignore huge portions of the constitution when it fits them, and scream from the mountaintops when their favorite laws are struck down rightfully as burdens upon our liberty.

The same morons would be going nuts if the SCOTUS struck down anti-drug laws as impositions on the sovereignty of the individual. But I can still fight with them on issues on which we agree.

[eno_]

No, I'm consistent: Drug laws bad, too.

So is tax withholding and financial reporting that forces banks to rat me out preemtively to get around the slight problem of prosecuting various financial "crimes" if nobody comes forth with an "oath and affirmation."

The questions opened by this ruling are GOOD for conservatism and will energize conservatism.