[God defeats Darwin]

Does it ever seem to anyone else that perhaps the bounds of healthy Christian principals are being pushed for the sole purpose of seeing how far they CAN be pushed? Like some sort of sick game for the Libs? I'm saddened by this decision, but almost want to recluse into a corner and ignore the world when I see where this is leading us. I would also like to point out that in the Good Book, incest, bestiality, sacraficing your children, and HOMOSEXUALITY are all listed together as "Wickedness" and "Detestable" (Leviticus ch. 18). Those are followed immediately in ch. 19 by "Do not lie" and "Do not steal". Hmmm, sound like a familiar argument many of us have used?
-Nate

[gcruse]

"And Georgia struck down the very same law that the United States Supreme Court upheld in Bowers.." The Georgia Supreme Court noted:

The individual's right to freely exercise his or her liberty is not dependent upon whether the majority believes such exercise to be moral, dishonorable, or wrong. Simply because something is beyond the pale of "majoritarian morality" does not place it beyond the scope of constitutional protection. To allow the moral indignation of a majority (or, even worse, a loud and/or radical minority) to justify criminalizing private consensual conduct would be a strike against freedoms paid for and preserved by our forefathers.

[oceanperch]

While it makes you feel like becoming recluse I want to shout louder to the world that I am a chaste single Conservative Catholic and do not want to feel groovy about others sex life.

I have no problem with friends and life long ones but spare me the sexuality mantra.

Gee I have two faithful companions and they happen to be canines shall we accomadate this as being a "marraige" I don't think so. Should my canines have insurance so to ease my suffering when they pass on...stay tuned..yes I am being sarcastic.

I agree with you it is crazy.