[aristeides]

You're picking a very shaky example to make your point.

It just happens to be the first use the Supreme Court has made of its Lawrence decision, the day after Kennedy said in Lawrence that that decision was just about criminal laws against sex between consenting adults, and did not concern sex with minors or prostitution or gay marriage.

[cherrycapital]

As has been pointed out, the issue in Limon wasn't the legality of statutory rape laws, but the legality of egregious discrimination against homosexual offenders v. heterosexual offenders. What is it about the outcome in Limon that you find objectionable?

[tdadams]

I know the case and I don't disagree. What I disagree with is you being intellectually dishonest and omitting some very pertinent facts about that case. Very clearly you're not interested in furthering an honest discussion, you're interested in demogoguery.