Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams
It's amazing how you do not consider my point, that Limon shows that Lawrence is not limited in its legal effects to cases involving sex between consenting adults.
56 posted on 06/28/2003 8:11:44 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
Libertarians are notoriously short-sighted. They figure what they can't see, can't hurt them.
59 posted on 06/28/2003 8:13:03 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
You're picking a very shaky example to make your point. The fact that you're doing a lot of dancing around the facts and details only confirms that.
60 posted on 06/28/2003 8:13:11 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
Do you think requiring equal sentences for homosexual and heterosexual offenses is a bad outcome?
62 posted on 06/28/2003 8:14:25 AM PDT by cherrycapital
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides
"It's amazing how you do not consider my point, that Limon shows that Lawrence is not limited in its legal effects to cases involving sex between consenting adults."

It's amazing how those with little grasp of history or legal consequences are announcing this ruling has 'no problems'.

I ask you all: How do you know what the consequence of this are??? How do you *know* this wont be taken, just like every other Supreme court ruling is, and expanded into every nook and cranny of possible application and logical consequence?
409 posted on 06/28/2003 1:44:03 PM PDT by WOSG (We liberated Iraq. Now Let's Free Cuba, North Korea, Iran, China, Tibet, Syria, ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson