Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams

As a matter of fact, we have seen this come out of the closet recently.. Look to internet "sex" sites. Listen to Larry Flynt. (he's a chicken screwer) Look at NAMBLA.

Incrementalism does exist.. The 2A is proof of such.

For you to poo-poo the obvious carries with it an implicit insult to the reader.

Also, when those laws were repealed, they were done so by the people of the States, in a lawful manner... Just as they were enacted int he first place. That's simple and it's fair.

Now however, you have the SC mandating a repeal and forcing their personal biases down the throats of everyone, everywhere, universally and without regard for the Tenth Amendment.

In addition, if copulation is a Constitutionally protected "right" and the Tenth Amendment is null and void, you will be hard pressed to find an argument to prevent gay marriage, homosexual sodomy, pedophelia, prostitution, bestality and so on and so forth..

The margins are eroding and the FED no right to meddle here.

These are clearly Tenth Amendment concerns.. and as such, fall to the states.

163 posted on 06/28/2003 9:13:25 AM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Jhoffa_
Also, when those laws were repealed, they were done so by the people of the States, in a lawful manner... Just as they were enacted int he first place. That's simple and it's fair.

Guess again. Of the eleven states to abolish their anti-sodomy laws in the wake of Bowers, ten did so by ruling of the state court.

178 posted on 06/28/2003 9:26:23 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson