Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Lawrence Worse Than Roe?
CRISIS Magazine - e-Letter ^ | 6/27/03 | Deal Hudson

Posted on 06/28/2003 7:08:52 AM PDT by Polycarp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 681-697 next last
To: tdadams
You're distorted.

Nope. I know parents who have had teenage daughters who were raped. I know women who were raped as teens. I know parents who had teenage sons homosexually molested, I know men who were homosexually molested as teenage boys.

I'm not distorted. I know exactly what I'm talking about. You are simply ignorant of the differences which I know and have seen firsthand.

181 posted on 06/28/2003 9:29:16 AM PDT by Polycarp (Just like calling others a Nazi, Once you throw out the label "homophobe" you have lost the debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
There used to be anti-sodomy laws in all 50 states. One by one as they were repealed, did we see people going down that slippery slope, asserting their right to sleep with goats?

Yes, absolutely, without question, bestiality proponents have gotten extremely bold. Do a Google search on barnyard sex, and you'll get over 39,000 results.

The judges who will rule in favor of the unenumerated right of bestiality will be former students of Harvard Law Professor and animal rights theorist Peter Singer.


182 posted on 06/28/2003 9:30:14 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Get real. You think Lawrence eroded states rights but Roe didn't? There goes any favorable estimation of your analytical skills.
183 posted on 06/28/2003 9:30:53 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
Of the eleven states to abolish their anti-sodomy laws in the wake of Bowers, ten did so by ruling of the state court.

Meaning that the "emerging awareness" is basically just that of the law school culture. And opinion in that milieu was enough to invalidate state law this past week, the same week when O'Connor used the fact that the leading law schools spawn our ruling class as justification for racial discrimination in choosing who goes there.

The power grab is becoming more and more undisguised.

184 posted on 06/28/2003 9:31:50 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Change your reasoning if you have to, but you were wrong. They weren't repealed as they were enacted, by the legislature.
185 posted on 06/28/2003 9:32:59 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Yesterday, in Limon, the Supreme Court vacated the sentence of someone who had homosexually molested a 14-year-old boy, on the basis of Lawrence.

I don't know the whole story, but from what I understand is the the 18 year old who molested a 14 year old will not get off scott free. What they said was that the 18 year old should have been prosecuted the same as he would have been had the minor been a female. They didn't overturn his crime, only the sentence because it was different than it would have been under the "statutory rape" law.

186 posted on 06/28/2003 9:33:05 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Well then: Don't you amoral, corn-holers have something better to do than use the power of the federal government to force your perversions upon other peoples communities?

No fair mentioning their tyrannical power-grab.


187 posted on 06/28/2003 9:33:35 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth

There's obviously nothing to keep the SC from effectively legalizing incest, bestality, or basically whatever sexual perversion they wish at this point..

If you toss out the Tenth, the the power of the fed is completely unchecked in this area.

188 posted on 06/28/2003 9:34:06 AM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
You seem to think your opinion on such matters is unquestionably universal. You don't think that's a bit arrogant?
189 posted on 06/28/2003 9:34:37 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
Get real. You think Lawrence eroded states rights but Roe didn't? There goes any favorable estimation of your analytical skills.

Get real, you libertarian fool, I think they both did. But they both grew out of Griswold. Why don't you tell me about Griswold V Connecticut (without looking it up). If you know nothing about Griswold, you are not qualified to judge my opinion. And I'm certain you knew nothing about Griswold prior to today.

190 posted on 06/28/2003 9:35:18 AM PDT by Polycarp (Just like calling others a Nazi, Once you throw out the label "homophobe" you have lost the debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
It IS worse than heterosexual rape

Not being female, I think that neither you nor I are in a position to judge. Of all of the horrors of homosexual molestation, however, one consequence is that you or I or society are not potontially burdened by the cost of raising an unwanted child. Otherwise, I would think the horrors are pretty much the same unless you subscribe to the theory that women find rape ejoyable, which by all accounts they do not.

191 posted on 06/28/2003 9:36:04 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The fact that we now have the internet and such phenomenon are more easily accesible and visible does not indicate an increased prevalence. But arguing so just might convince the gullible.
192 posted on 06/28/2003 9:37:06 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Otherwise, I would think the horrors are pretty much the same

You would be wrong.

193 posted on 06/28/2003 9:37:40 AM PDT by Polycarp (Just like calling others a Nazi, Once you throw out the label "homophobe" you have lost the debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

You don't know what you're talking about.. Some were overturned, but the majority of State Sodomy laws were Repealed.

United States Anti-"Sodomy" Laws

Further, even if, for the sake of argument, they were ALL overturned at the State level.. It does nothing to justify this Unconstitutional intrusion by the FED.

This is quite simply a States issue from beginning to end.

194 posted on 06/28/2003 9:39:59 AM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Meaning that the "emerging awareness" is basically just that of the law school culture.

I see you've embraced Justice Scalia's dissent with all the credulity of granny watching her televangelists.

195 posted on 06/28/2003 9:40:22 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: cherrycapital
Yes, the yahoos and pinheads were elected by mostly yahoos and pinheads. And yes, that is what I don't like about them. That even the most illiterate wino can have a say, however small, in making laws for other people, is apparently what conservatives think is great about America.

Libertarian totalitarianism in all it's splendor. There are plenty of other adjectives to apply but I'll resist them.

You Mr Libertarian wouldn't know freedom if it bit you on your ass.

196 posted on 06/28/2003 9:41:50 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
Not only that but they were completely silent about why Lawrence v. Texas should have any influence in this case. They simply said "in light of Lawrence v. Texas" without elaboration.
197 posted on 06/28/2003 9:41:51 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

It has taken every last fiber of my being to not elaborate on this comment..

198 posted on 06/28/2003 9:43:50 AM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
It appears that the SC can do any damn thing they want to. It appears that the SC is now the Supreme ruler of America. It appears the SC doesn't give a damn about what the other two branches of government think.
199 posted on 06/28/2003 9:44:04 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
I happen to be a graduate of Yale Law School. I'm quite familiar with the law school culture.
200 posted on 06/28/2003 9:44:22 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 681-697 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson