Impeach THE Six Supreme Court Justices

National Lawyers Guild ^ | Sometime in 2001 | Nathan Newman, NLG National Vice President

[ALS]

:)

[DannyTN]

ROFL

[Cboldt]

NOT the FIVE CONSERAVTIVE JUDGES mentioned in the Article -- but the SIX JUSTICES who Thursday threw our Nation and Laws into the pits of chaos, selfishness and anarchy.

A stable and "just" society cannot be maintained by the mere force of law. It must find additional substance for its foundation. Pure selfishness is an embodiment of evil.

While I find the SCOTUS decisions lacking in moral fiber, it's my opinion that legal lapses do not cause social decay, they merely reflect it.

[DannyTN]

That graphic cracked me up!!!

I haven't laughed that hard in a long time.

[MaxPlus305]

Um, dont' we have at least a couple from these six to thank for for deciding in favor of Bush during the election? Seeing as there are a few conservatives on this board who are OK with their sodomy ruling this week, what they did was hardly hard-core liberal.

[sinkspur]

While I find the SCOTUS decisions lacking in moral fiber, it's my opinion that legal lapses do not cause social decay, they merely reflect it.

Exactly. No one can force you to act immorally.

[Petronski]

The Texas Sodomy decision was the worst decision--in terms of reasoning--I have seen since Casey or Roe or Plessy.

Sickening.

[BOBWADE]

The dims sounded like this after BushVGore. Lets not stoop to their level. Its bad law but it is the law. Get over it until we can get more conservatives sitting on the bench.

[ALS]

hehehehe

life's a gas!

[Cboldt]

Exactly. No one can force you to act immorally

Or morally. Society's strength is multi-faceted, and law is but one facet. When law becomes the overpowering force .... individuals lose freedom..

[FreeReign]

It would be unconstitutional to impeach a justice for a wrong decision. It's the seperation of powers thingy.

[OREALLY]

The six liberal justices have damned their own souls in my opinion...God bless the 3 justices who remained faithful.

[ALS]

What if the decision was based upon social engineering and had the effect of nullifying certain critical parts of the Constitution?

I realize we can't impeach just because we don't like it, but what constitutes a valid reason? Ignoring scurious personal behavior of course.

[ALS]

amen to that

[Uncle Miltie]

"You might as well have impeached the 1972 court for giving us the Roe v. Wade decision."

An excellent idea, if late. Nip it in the bud, I always say.

[aristeides]

I'm afraid impeachment is a nonstarter, politically. But what it might be possible to do is a Defense of Marriage Amendment. And that would serve as a repudiation of the Lawrence decision, and probably embarrass the justices.

[MEG33]

Thanks for posting this.A quick google shows who they associate with and the communists were their founders(not that they say so).Many times they promote justice where its needed but they are very far left wing.

[OldEagle]

I have not read the TX law in question and do not know how it defined the sodomy that it prohibited. It is entirely possible that it also prohibited so-called sodomy that is practiced by hetero couples as well.
Regardless, it is reasonable to affirm that whatever consenting adults do harmlessly in private is none of anybody's business.
I am not clear on why the Supremes thought the TX law was unconstitutional.

[nuzman]

Local radio guys in Madison, WI (the Berekley of the Midwest) actually called for Scalia's impeachment.