The above was your first post on the thread. It sounds like you disagree with the article which said:
To say that corporations simply are chasing after cheap labor is only partially correct, as there is more to successful capital investing than finding workers willing to toil for peanuts. If that were truly the case, as critics of the left and right are charging, then low-wage backwaters like Rwanda and Zimbabwe would receive the lion's share of investments from the West.
The author says education plays a role in productivity.
So, is the author clueless about everything, or is he correct about this and clueless about everything else?