Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Myth of "Exporting Jobs"
Ludwig von Mises Institute ^ | June 27, 2003 | William L. Anderson

Posted on 06/27/2003 8:03:39 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg

The Myth of "Exporting Jobs"

by William L. Anderson

[Posted June 27, 2003]

As U.S. trade deficits continue to pile up, and as the economy continues in its slow-growth patterns, a number of economic commentators have been accusing American corporations of causing the trouble by "exporting jobs." Now, given the bounty of economic myths that economists and media pundits seem to foist upon us, one should not be surprised at anything we read in the academic literature or popular press, but the newest set of fallacies that we are hearing is especially insidious.

In his path-breaking Principles of Economics, Carl Menger writes in the first chapter, "All things are subject to the law of cause and effect." While such a truth seems to be self-evident, one needs to be careful in separating cause and effect or determining the correct line of causality. Unfortunately, the modern pundits are guilty of convoluting the order of things; thus, we hear nonsensical things like trade deficits are the result of budget deficits or that free exchange creates an overall decrease in a country's standard of living. As usual, the "experts" blame business leaders while politicians and bureaucrats are given a free pass.

This is not a standard article on defense of free trade; writers in the Austrian tradition like Murray Rothbard, Henry Hazlitt, and Mark Brandly have eloquently explained the process and have painstakingly pointed out why attempts to throw sand in the gears of trading relations between individuals can only make matters worse, and I do not think I can improve on their work.

However, the "newest" set of challenges to free trade, some from the right and some from the left, need to be answered. Furthermore, we need to point out why U.S. businesses continue to look overseas for investment opportunities and give a reasonable explanation as to why trying to block such activity will only make things worse in this country.

The first and most important thing to point out here is that the phrase "exporting jobs" is a misnomer. A job is not a good, nor is it a service, so it cannot be imported or exported. Only goods can fit that terminology, and one can neither purchase nor sell a job, so to say that U.S. corporations are "exporting jobs" is at best to be using economic language in a sloppy and inaccurate way; at worst, it is yet another contribution to the Keynesian morass that pervades modern economic thinking. (One can exchange things like labor and capital, but neither of those are jobs. The term "job" is a formal designation we give to action associated with the creation of goods, but they are not goods themselves.)

That being said, there are serious problems for which advocates of free trade are being blamed—when, in reality, the failure of government to permit free trade within the borders of the United States is ground zero. Far from causing our standard of living to deteriorate, real free trade would permit new economic opportunities not only for people at home, but also for people abroad.

The first question one asks is why U.S. corporations choose to do more and more of their investing overseas, as opposed to investment being centered within our borders. To say that corporations simply are chasing after cheap labor is only partially correct, as there is more to successful capital investing than finding workers willing to toil for peanuts. If that were truly the case, as critics of the left and right are charging, then low-wage backwaters like Rwanda and Zimbabwe would receive the lion's share of investments from the West.

That individuals and corporations do not choose to invest simply where labor is cheapest should be obvious to people, since most capital development originating from western business owners is done either in other western countries or the more economically advanced regions in Asia. Moreover, the decision to invest apart from one's home country is a much more complicated affair than the critics may be saying.

Things like language and cultural barriers, as well as changes in the legal environment are important items for firm managers and owners to consider when they are deciding whether or not to invest huge sums of money into a place. Transportation facilities and costs, as well as proximity to a certain market also fall into the decision matrix.

I mention these things because overseas investing by American firms has been especially targeted by individuals on both the right and the left who see something sinister in a U.S. company shutting down some operations in this country to locate them where labor is cheaper. (If one recalls, the most repeated line from the 1992 U.S. presidential election was independent Ross Perot's "giant sucking sound" that would be heard if Mexico and this country were to liberalize trade.)

Economist Paul Craig Roberts, who has devoted a number of his syndicated columns to trade issues, writes that the relatively free flow of capital, technology, and information (what he calls "outsourcing") across international borders is not the same as the free flow of traded goods. He writes:

Trade implies reciprocity. It is a two-way street. There is no reciprocity in outsourcing, only the export of domestic jobs. That's why the United States is currently running a $125 billion trade deficit with China alone, a Third World country. . . . An economy can, of course, stand some outsourcing. But when goods and services in general are outsourced, where is the economy?[i]

Roberts has written elsewhere that production of goods creates wealth because of the "value added" process of manufacturing. For example, a tree is first cut down, then sent to the sawmill, then made into lumber, and finally into the finished product of a house, furniture, or whatever it may be. At each stage, there is "value added" to the raw material.

While no doubt there are changes at each stage of manufacturing and distribution, the "value added" concept has no place in economic thinking and clearly is at odds with Menger's emphasis that the value of the factors of production emanates from the value of the final product. In other words, value flows from the final product backwards (or downwards), not upwards, as Roberts suggests. To put it another way, the concept of "value added" is something used for accounting purposes, but is not a true form of economic measurement.

Beyond that, there are other problems with Robert's analysis—although I also need to add that the prospect of manufacturing more and more things overseas does have implications at home, things with which I will deal (and find that Roberts in this area has some important and insightful things to say). The first deals with the notion that if we "ship out" all jobs, we will somehow have nothing to do.

For many years, economics has been plagued with the "lump of jobs" fallacy in which it is believed there are only a limited amount of things to do and once they are done, people have no means of employment. The truth is the polar opposite; there literally are an infinite number of things that must be done. As Alchian and Allen have noted in their 1983 book Exchange and Production, the elimination of some tasks due to improved methods of productivity frees up scarce labor to do other things. That, they point out, is how an economy grows, a simple truth that seems to have escaped most of the economics profession.

However, while Roberts no doubt agrees with that assessment, his point cannot be ignored. Take my present home of Cumberland, Maryland, for example. During the latter half of the 19th Century and for much of the 20th Century, Cumberland was a manufacturing center and home to many firms. However, following World War II, firms closed down here and either have gone out of business or relocated.

That phenomenon has changed the face of employment here. In its manufacturing heyday, people in Cumberland (which had twice the population it has today) were relatively well off compared to people elsewhere in this country. Today, while most people enjoy a standard of living that is absolutely higher than people here enjoyed five decades ago, they are relatively poorer compared with people in other cities. Furthermore, the economic future here seems to be more of the same.

While the changes here have been somewhat tragic, there are reasons why they occurred. First, this area for many years has been strongly pro-union, and few manufacturers and investors want to deal with labor unions if they can avoid it. Second, the State of Maryland has a leftist government and over the years has proven itself to be extremely hostile to private enterprise and private property. Third, as Maryland's economic position has deteriorated, the state government has taken an even more active role in trying to make up the difference, which means high taxes, bureaucracy, and other such barriers to private investment.

Roberts himself points out that the relatively well-educated but low-earning laborers of many Asian countries gain an advantage to workers in this country because of our legal situation. He writes:

The advantage (of foreign workers) increases with the absence of tort lawyer extortions and harassing and fining IRS, EPA, OSHA, EEOC and other regulatory bureaucracies, whose budgets demand a never ending supply of wrongdoers to be penalized.[ii]

In one sense, the Law of Comparative Advantage still holds. If workers overseas own a comparative advantage to workers here because of the predations of U.S. national, state, and local governments, it still is a comparative advantage and one cannot fault people for taking advantage of that situation. However, we must add that such a situation is self-inflicted. If U.S. workers want to price themselves out of market after market, they are free to do so, but must pay the consequences.

(The current federal harassment of Martha Stewart is another example of this phenomenon in action. The economic meaning of this episode to other investors, entrepreneurs, and executives is that doing well in the United States will lead to one's being targeted by prosecutors and tort lawyers. The end result is less investment here, which ultimately means that Americans are wildly cheering themselves into a long-term condition of a lower standard of living.)

Without the regulatory burdens that American firms typically face, much more manufacturing would go on here. To restrict people from closing operations or investing overseas, as Patrick Buchanan has urged, would only make things worse, however. First, the imposition of even more restrictions, regulations, and legal burdens would simply discourage investment; such policies ultimately would have the effect of chilling the creation of new goods. Second, the low cost of overseas manufacturing at least means lower costs for goods here. Eliminate that possibility and we have the prospect of no jobs and fewer goods at home.

To put it another way, U.S. policies already in place lead to fewer economic opportunities. Choking off the possibility of overseas investment will not improve the situation here. In this case, Buchanan is presenting a false choice: he declares that if firms in this country are forbidden to invest in other firms, they will invest the same amounts of money here. That simply is not true.

On one last issue, Roberts also has written that the growth of U.S. agriculture sales abroad is proof that we are becoming a Third World economy. Given the nature of vast growing lands in this country, that is not an accurate assessment of things. Not only does this country enjoy the lands where agriculture can thrive, but also his picture of U.S. farming being a low-tech, peasant-like activity is also false.

Farming in this country is both capital intensive and extremely high-tech. A productive U.S. farm cannot be compared with a small plot of land worked by peasants in India. Granted, this leaves out the discussion of environmental regulations, farm subsidies, and the irresponsible government distribution of water in arid regions to agricultural entities located in the western states, but to say that the production of food somehow is a lowly thing is a bit silly and ignores the scientific advancements that have been made in this area.

In short, Roberts is partly correct. Policies pushed by politicians and bureaucrats in this country have eliminated many economic opportunities. The answer, however, is not to close off our borders, but to close off the government. We cannot have big, intrusive government and a healthy economy at the same time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

William Anderson, an adjunct scholar of the Mises Institute, teaches economics at Frostburg State University. Send him MAIL. See his Mises.org Articles Archive.

[i] Paul Craig Roberts, “Notes for Free Traders,” March 5, 2003.

[ii] Ibid.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: freetrade; leftwingactivists; mises
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-384 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot
Where is this subsidy?

If you mean by making investment unprofitable here then it is more profitable to invest elsewhere, then you're right.

He's talking about the government-support OPIC that helps companies relocate.

It's the least the government can do after taxing and regulating the living s**t out of American businesses.

141 posted on 06/27/2003 1:47:08 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
What I specifically referring to is the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, a US government agency. Here is a link to get you started. OPIC – A US Govt. agency exporting capital.
142 posted on 06/27/2003 1:48:31 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
It's the least the government can do after taxing and regulating the living s**t out of American businesses.

Thank you Jiang Zemin

143 posted on 06/27/2003 1:49:23 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Indeed! Interesting that the author is in an 'Austrian' think-tank...

Periodicals Daily Articles Events Resources Audio Members
Home About E-mail Lists Shopping Cart
Google.com
Friday, June 27, 2003

Ludwig von Mises Institute (special report)

All About the Mises Institute:
A Special Report

Who is Ludwig von Mises?
Who is Murray N. Rothbard?

What is "Austrian Economics"?
Why Austrian Economics Matters
What is "Classical Liberalism"?
Natural Elites, Intellectuals, and the State

Great Austrian Economists
Benjamin Anderson
Frederic Bastiat
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk
Richard Cantillon
Frank Fetter
Gottfried von Haberler
Henry Hazlitt
F.A. Hayek
William Harold Hutt
Ludwig Lachmann
Fritz Machlup
Juan De Mariana
Carl Menger
Margit von Mises
Luis de Molina
Oskar Morgenstern
Wilhelm Röpke
Jean-Baptiste Say
Richard von Strigl
A.R.J. Turgot
Phillip Wicksteed
Friedrich von Wieser

The Mises Family Coat of ArmsThe Institute's coat of arms is that of the Mises family, awarded in 1881 when Ludwig von Mises's great-grandfather Mayer Rachmiel Mises was ennobled by the Emperor Franz Josef I of Austria.
 
In the upper right-hand quadrant is the staff of Mercury, god of commerce and communication (the Mises family was successful in both; they were merchants and bankers). In the lower left-hand quadrant is a representation of the Ten Commandments. Mayer Rachmiel, as well as his father, presided over various Jewish cultural organizations in Lemberg, the city where Ludwig was born.

MISSION

The Ludwig von Mises Institute is the research and educational center of classical liberalism, libertarian political theory, and the Austrian School of economics. Working in the intellectual tradition of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) and Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995), with a vast array of publications, programs, and fellowships, the Mises Institute seeks a radical shift in the intellectual climate as the foundation for a renewal of the free and prosperous commonwealth.

It is the mission of the Mises Institute to restore a high place for theory in economics and the social sciences, encourage a revival of critical historical research, and draw attention to neglected traditions in Western philosophy. In this cause, the Mises Institute works to advance the Austrian School of economics and the Misesian tradition, and, in application, defends the market economy, private property, sound money, and peaceful international relations, while opposing government intervention as economically and socially destructive.

HISTORY

In December 1981, Ludwig von Mises's widow Margit gave her approval to found the Mises Institute. It was formally established in October 1982 and located in Auburn, Alabama, with founder Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. serving as president. With the support of Margit von Mises, who chaired the board until her death in 1993, and such giants as F.A. Hayek, Lawrence Fertig, Henry Hazlitt, and Murray N. Rothbard, who headed its academic programs until his death in 1995, the Mises Institute has grown into the leading scholarly center for research and teaching in the Austrian School of economics, as well as an important research center for classical liberalism and libertarianism.

The Mises Institute has 250 faculty members working with it on one or more academic projects. With their help, and thousands of donors in 50 states and 64 foreign countries, the Institute has held more than 500 teaching conferences, including the Mises University, and seminars on subjects from monetary policy to the history of war, as well as international and interdisciplinary Austrian Scholars Conferences. From these programs, the Institute has sponsored many book and hundreds of scholarly papers, in addition to thousands of published popular articles on economic and historical issues.

The Mises Institute publishes books by Ludwig von Mises and other new and old works by Austrian economists and historians, maintains the complete Mises bibliography, manages the archive and literary rights of Murray N. Rothbard, and publishes six periodicals, including two academic journals and a scholarly review of literature. The in-house Massey and Ward Libraries are a multilingual collection of more than 30,000 volumes, including Rothbard's personal library, which makes it one of the most extensive specialized collections of its kind in North America.

The Mises Institute website, Mises.org, went online in 1995. A reliable and stable research tool, it features working papers, study guides, bibliographies, biographies, e-books, publication archives, a calendar of events, fellowship applications, audio downloads, foreign language materials, a faculty directory, research tools, daily editorials, local on-site library access, and an online catalog of publications. Mises.org provides open access, is linked from classrooms and libraries around the world, and has earned a far higher Alexa ranking than any market-oriented non profit in the world.

The Institute has produced documentary films: "Liberty and Economics: The Ludwig von Mises Legacy"; "The Future of Austrian Economics"; and "Money, Banking, and the Federal Reserve." The Institute has also published or subsidized the publication of 125 books and monographs, from Man, Economy, and State to Theory and History and Human Action, and distributes a scholarly book catalog in Austrian economics. Altogether, the Institute has distributed six and a half million books, journals, monographs, newsletters, audio tapes, and video tapes throughout the world.

Helping students to discover the economics of freedom, and inspiring them to go on to teach at the university level, is perhaps the Institute's most important program. The Institute has held 17 Mises University summer schools for students from all over America and the world, and has assisted 7,000 students at over 900 colleges and universities with aid ranging from one-year book scholarships to full multi-year PhD fellowships. Altogether, it has reached millions of students at all levels.

In 1998, The Mises Institute moved into a new facility at 518 West Magnolia Avenue that houses an extensive and unique library in the social sciences. The building was extended in 2000-2001 to accommodate the need for more library and faculty space. Developmental emphasis for the future includes increases in on-site faculty chairs, summer-long programs, year-round internships and post-doc research facilities, and distance-learning certificates. Publishing projects include original and traditional Austrian works, the collected letters of Murray Rothbard, translations of classic Austrian writings, as well as broad periodical distribution.

The Institute is named to honor the life and work of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973). In six decades of teaching and writing, he reconstructed economic theory and method on a sound basis of individual human action and showed that government intervention is always destructive, whether through welfare, inflation, taxation, regulation, or war. His vision of the free and prosperous commonwealth is carried forward in all the work of the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Seven Periodicals Our monthly The Free Market examines the economic and political scene from a classical-liberal viewpoint. The Austrian Economics Newsletter links our academic network with in-depth interviews. The Mises Review surveys new books. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics (the successor journal to the Review of Austrian Economics), is the premier setting for new research and ideas in economics. The Journal of Libertarian Studies is the scholarly venue for political theory and applications. And The Mises Memo covers issues and legislation, plus conferences and publications of the Mises Institute.

Fellowships Through our Fellowships, we give top students of the Austrian School the practical support and intellectual tools they need to thrive in today's academic setting. We provide books and periodicals, internships, academic counseling, and financial assistance to help them become the professors and intellectual leaders of tomorrow. In-house fellowships are available for disseration writing and post-doc work.

Research. Serious scholarly work in economic theory and intellectual history does not receive the support it deserves from large foundations. To fill this crucial gap, the Mises Institute offers long-term grants for in-depth research in the Austrian tradition. Among the projects currently being backed are studies in U.S. banking history, the economics of cryptography, the viability of currency boards, and biographical studies of the Austrian School's major figures and their role in intellectual history.

Online Research Aids. Mises.org's Scholars Page features online books, the Austrian Study Guide, a complete online resource of Austrian School literature, linked to online articles, where possible; the complete searchable text to Human Action (3/4th edition) among many other writings by Mises; out-out-print classics by Austrian scholars; constantly updated Working Papers; and the complete and searchable Mises Bibliography and Rothbard Bibliography.

Teaching We sponsor the world's finest teaching programs, including the annual Mises University, the History of Liberty Teaching Seminar, the Human Action Seminar, and the Rothbard Graduate Seminar attracting the best students from the U.S. and around the world. Thanks to outstanding curricula and faculty, our alumni rank among the best economists, historians, and philosophers working today.

Academic Meetings The Austrian Scholars Conference is the annual professional meeting where new papers in the Misesian tradition are presented and debated, and faculty and students are able to escape the politicized environments of their home campuses. We also hold regular scholarly conferences on economics, history, philosophy, and law, as well as private colloquia exploring new avenues of research.

Academic Awards The Schlarbaum Prize for lifetime defense of liberty, given every year, awards $10,000 to a public intellectual or distinquished scholar. The Kurzweg Family Prize awards $5,000 for the defense of liberty, property, and personal responsibility. The Elgin Groseclose Award, a $20 Liberty Head Double Eagle, goes to the best piece of money writing in the previous year. The Lawrence W. Fertig Prize in Austrian Economics awards $1,000 to the author of a paper that best advances economic science in the Austrian tradition. The O.P. Alford III Prize in Libertarian Scholarship awards $1,000 to the author of the paper best advances libertarian scholarship.

Books The Mises Institute publishes important new books and reprints classics, including The Scholar's Edition of Human Action; Man, Economy, and State; The Case Against the Fed; The Costs of War; and Theory and History, among fifty other titles. Our book catalog, The Library of the Austrian School, makes them available to students and the public.

Commentary The Mises Institute balances the social-democratic domination of public debate with major newspapers and magazines featuring Mises Institute articles. Mises.org's Daily Articles are linked and reprinted the world over. In-box subscriptions are distributed at no charge (current subscribers 8,000). Our speakers' program spreads a pro-liberty message on talk shows and at conferences and meetings around the country and the world.

Audio and Video All our conferences on such diverse topics as welfare, bureaucracy, war, and monetary reform, as well as our weekly seminars, are available on tape. And we've produced award-winning films, including one on Mises and another on the misdeeds of the Federal Reserve System. Mises.org offers .mp3 files of Mises speaking and Rothbard teaching , as well as complete audio files of selected conferences (again, at no charge). The audio page includes the remarkable series of lectures Robert LeFevre Commentaries.

Mises Institute Office Our library and research facilities in Auburn, Alabama provide a huge, multilingual collection of books and archives (see the Ward Library), ongoing seminars, and a collegial atmosphere for completing dissertations, doing post-doc work, helping with translations and other projects, or using sabbatical time to do Austrian work. 


Senior Faculty  


A Message from the President 

After more than a century of statism, war, and political regimentation, it is time for a renaissance of liberty, both in scholarship and public life. Political action is no substitute for a real long-term revolution in ideas. The Mises Institute was founded to make that possible, and we're succeeding through a huge range of programs that have served students, scholars, and professionals all over the world. By advancing the Austrian School and the scholarship of liberty, the Institute is bringing about change for the better. But we need your help as a Member. The free society needs fearless and passionate defenders in all walks of life.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Founder and President

Please Join Us

For as little as $40 a year, you can become a Member of the Mises Institute and join our work for the free society. You will receive The Free Market, The Mises Memo, and other publications, as well as the gratitude of the students and teachers of liberty. Please note: the Mises Institute is funded entirely by voluntary contributions, from individuals, businesses, and foundations. 

The Mises Institute is an equal opportunity employer. Down load our policy in English or Spanish.

Contact us here.

 

Content
Marketwatch
Mises Blog
LewRockwell.com
Calendar
About Mises
About Rothbard
Fun * Free Ads

STUDENTS
Library
Working Papers
Study Guide
Conferences
Mises Classroom
Fellowships

ONLINE BOOKS
Human Action
Mises Books and Essays
Rothbard Books and Essays
Foundational Writings
More E-texts
Palm Books

JOURNALS
Quarterly Jrn of Austrian Economics
Journal of Libertarian Studies
Mises Review
Free Market
Austrian Economics Newsletter
Left & Right
Review of Austrian Economics

MORE RESEARCH AIDS
What's New
Mises Bib.
Rothbard Bib.
Austrian Bios
Films on Liberty
Faculty
Offsite

^ Top of Page

Print Friendly Page
SEND THIS PAGE TO AN ASSOCIATE
TO:
(Enter the email address)
FROM:
(Enter your email address)
Ludwig von Mises Institute
518 West Magnolia Avenue
Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528

334.321.2100 · Phone
334.321.2119 · Fax

contact@mises.org

MISES.ORG MENU
Home
About
Email Lists
Blog
Periodicals
Articles
Resources
Audio
Fun
Study Guide
Working Papers
Mises
Rothbard
Catalog
Shopping Basket
Donate
Coming Events
What's New
© 2003 Mises.org Database Programming, Site Design and Hosting by Inter Web Data Concepts, LLC.

144 posted on 06/27/2003 1:49:34 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Hey, I'm the one calling for tearing down the internal barriers to American enterprise.

You just demand that everyone else get their legs chopped off instead of broken.

OPIC, after relentlessly taxing and regulating American firms to the edge of bankruptcy, is the LEAST the government can do for those businesses. Taxes paid ARE supposed to provide some form of benefit to the taxed, are they not?
145 posted on 06/27/2003 1:49:57 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Please since from your posts on this subject you seem to be a committed Marxist of the PRC stripe would you not use that label on those who are Americans.
146 posted on 06/27/2003 1:50:33 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
The U.S. was built on confiscatory taxes? That's a new one.
147 posted on 06/27/2003 1:51:33 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You compete with productivity.

That is correct. Productivity is also a function of capital investment.

148 posted on 06/27/2003 1:52:20 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
The US is a debtor nation, impoting more than it exports.

Marx actually promoted free trade for the west, figuring it would increase the gap between the haves and the have nots. Since real income in the US has actually fallen over the last 20 years, it seems he was right.

149 posted on 06/27/2003 1:52:27 PM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Interesting that the author is in an 'Austrian' think-tank...

Please enlighten us. [laughing]

150 posted on 06/27/2003 1:54:20 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Please since from your posts on this subject you seem to be a committed Marxist of the PRC stripe would you not use that label on those who are Americans.

I will pretend I didn't hear that. This time.

I'm calling for an end o the insane tax and regulatory policies that convince American businesses to leave.

You, on the other hand, are demanding that American businesses say "THANK YOU SIR, MAY I HAVE ANOTHER!"

So kindly shut your f***ing mouth, a$$wipe.

151 posted on 06/27/2003 1:54:54 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Do what all those Oriental immigrants do and open your own business.

Did you ever happen to notice that Orientaly business owners that come to this country and open small to medium size businesses generally only employee their own family members or other orientals? In California, and other places, this is what is taking place. They take down the old English signs and put up signs in Chinese etc. I could show you entire areas where there are no signs or very few in English, and they operate almost 100 percent for other Asians, by Asians...They are not only opening up businesses, they are opening up entire Asian towns, that generally only cater to other Asians...

Even though many have a good work ethic, I find this offensive that they come into American, and have no intention of assimilating into our country and generally only cater to and do business amongst each other. I can name many *large* areas that have been completely changed and appear Chinese or Asian like, in every aspect, including the Asian gangs, that as recently as two days ago, stood outside of a Chinese cleaners and four Asians opened fire with mulitple high powered weapons, killing one female worker inside the Asian owned cleaners, the victim had just entered the U.S. a week earlier. This was all in *broad day light*, and was even caught on video tape.

152 posted on 06/27/2003 1:56:10 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
The system has been tried before. It didn't work that well. It was called "National Socialism".

It is a touchy subject, but let me try. National Socialism was much more effective than Soviet Socialism. It did not nationalise the industry - it subjected it to the national interest as understood by its government. Nazi Germany did not collapse economically - it was defeated MILITARLY with the great effort of many nations.

Anyway, there are many ways to reconcile national interests with market economy and not every such way has to be to be Nazi-like. It is a false alternative - not everyone who refuses to worship "free" market is a fascist. But for sure, "free" market fundamentalists help fascists and communists to get support.

153 posted on 06/27/2003 1:57:46 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
How about a truck driver that loads and hauls? Labor, service or transfer of wealth?
No labor was mixed to the raw material to make a good. The commodity was just moved to another location, presumably a store convenient to the consumer.

You answered your own question.
Haul it around all you want.
It's the exact same good that existed before.
All you did was add cost to move it around.
Nothing new was created.

154 posted on 06/27/2003 1:58:31 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Even though many have a good work ethic, I find this offensive that they come into American, and have no intention of assimilating into our country and generally only cater to and do business amongst each other.

How is this different from the idea that Americans should only buy American goods?

155 posted on 06/27/2003 1:59:26 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
So you agree with Marx? I'm glad that's settled. Was he the one that told you our real income is falling?
156 posted on 06/27/2003 2:00:16 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; ffusco
All you did was add cost to move it around. Nothing new was created.

So, moving a good from the port in San Diego to Chicago doesn't add value? It sure makes it easier for me to buy.

I guess if it didn't add any value I could just drive to and from California to pick it up?

157 posted on 06/27/2003 2:02:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
The Overseas Investment Act makes low interest loans to companies going overseas as well as guaranteeing their investment if the foreign countries nationalize them or they are destroyed in war. This isn't a subsidy? Try moving a business over into the next county and see how much subsidy you receive but move it overseas and you are in hog heaven. There is a big difference in free trade and fair trade.

Fair trade would set tariffs equal to the cost of our regulations and enviromental laws or fair trade would eliminate all our regulations equal to the regulations in Botswana. Then we would see fair trade. Until then, we are seeing unfair trade promoted and subsidized by our government.

Maybe you free traders want to see the same condition here as in the the third world. If you do that is exactly where you are headed in this race to the bottom our government is promoting. Personally I prefer carpet instead of mud floors and clean drinking water that looks clear.

158 posted on 06/27/2003 2:02:20 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
The U.S. was built on confiscatory taxes? That's a new one.

Your remark is a proof that you are not a naturalized American. If you had to prepare for the citizenship exam, you would learn that the protective tariffs were the key source of income for the federal government.

BTW, it was the slave labor South which was opposed to tariffs.

159 posted on 06/27/2003 2:02:46 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
How is this different from the idea that Americans should only buy American goods?

Well...uh...because...uh...well...but, like...WE'RE AMERICANS, DUDE!

160 posted on 06/27/2003 2:03:07 PM PDT by Poohbah (I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-384 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson