[Darksheare]

Libraries can still be of use.
Why must you label everything and so close-mindedly insist everything MUST be and MUST conform to what you say it must?
Do you do that with God as well?
Do you say that "He cannot possibly go beyond these limits!"?

You amuse me.

You believe in a Fahrenheit 451 society, so you believe in the same thing the Libs do: total control of what people think.
Get back to the point: Children do not need to be exposed to porn. And any responsible adult that sees the protection of a child by blocking porn as a Hillary-esque Village People act is a moron.
Oh, I see you have your hand raised.

[JohnGalt]

People are reading your posts right now and laughing at you.

(Lurkers, you know who you are, send me a freep mail.)


Associating ending a government program with the neo-fascism of Fahrenheit 451 is a left wing tactic, most famously seen in 1995. Only a lazy parent would leave their child alone to play on the Internet in a government building. It is conservative to put responsiblity in the hands of parents, laziness to leave it to the gubmint.

You believe in the nanny-state; I don't.

As to libraries, they are more than welcome to compete for funding from their patrons, but I do not use them, so I don't think I should be force to pay for a service used by the middle class who are too cheap to purchase the books themselves.