[jimt]

52 years is not adequate. He deserves death.

[Theodore R.]

In LA, 52 years does not necessarily mean 52 years, does it?

Some LA jurors weep at the low socio-economic background of certain defendants and forget the actual crime that was committed.

If this is not a death penalty, what would be? Maybe LA is too lenient with her criminals, just like she is with her corrupt politicians?