Replies

Can you read? - I asked you a specific question just above:

"Is what kind of sodomy 'wrong' in what context to whom?"

Yes, I can read, but you obiously can't take a hint and since you won't but out (no pun intended), I'll ask you the question, specificly.

Is it wrong for a man to insert his penis into the rectum of another human being?

Additional information to aid in specificity:

The rectum's natural function is to excrete fecal matter.

A simple 'yes' or 'no' will do.

Can you read? - I asked you a specific question just above:
"Is what kind of sodomy 'wrong' in what context to whom?"

Yes, I can read, but you obiously can't take a hint and since you won't but out (no pun intended), I'll ask you the question, specificly.
Is it wrong for a man to insert his penis into the rectum of another human being?
Additional information to aid in specificity:
The rectum's natural function is to excrete fecal matter.
A simple 'yes' or 'no' will do.
44 -pipe-

Sorry but you have only specifed 'what kind' of disgusting act you dwell on 'to whom'.. I'll agree it is a nasty form of sex.

Now specify what is constitutionally 'wrong' in that act in what context.

Is it wrong for a man to insert his penis into the rectum of another human being?

Let me give it a try.

Is it WRONG? Yes.

Should it be CRIMINAL? No.

Is it wrong for a man to insert his penis into the rectum of another human being?

It may be wrong but should it be illegal?

Actually, according to the Texas law it was only wrong (unlawful) for a man to do it to another man. It was legal for a man to do it to his wife or, presumably, any other consenting female adult. I know many were expecting this to be decided as a 14th amendment issue

…No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.…

But they have – if I understand it correctly – recognized sodomy between consenting adults as a right.

I am not sure I see a reason that a state should be able to forbid such actions. I believe that God, on the other hand, is able to, and has forbidden such actions. Perhaps it is because I live in Seattle and have Jim Mcdermott, Patty Murray and, Maria Cantwell representing me, but I am not eager to have politicians interpreting scripture.