To: Destro
The cells are assisted by the Bosnians and Chechyns, the cells are assisted by the Saudis, the cells are assisted by Iraq, the cells are assisted by Iran, the cells are assisted...
I understand your frustration. However, couldn't it simply be a case of targeting those that are on the radar at the moment? By the same logic, shouldn't we be targeting Hamas and Hezbollah, today?
And, lastly, do you want the president to put all of the cards on the table, give the American public the full picture, all at once? Do you think the majority of Americans would be able to grasp the significance? Most Americans do not want to think about Iraqi agents within our country, let alone Iraq or al Qaeda helping in the OKC Bombing. Most Americans can only understand what is put forward at any given time.
Do you really think that by not supporting Bush's war on terror, that the likes of Kerry or Dean will pick up the responsibility, and clean up the messes of Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43, etc? What alternative do you have, at the moment?
18 posted on
06/28/2003 6:24:42 PM PDT by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Yup, Bush is the best we can hope for.....
19 posted on
06/28/2003 6:27:27 PM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson