To: GOPcapitalist
You misunderstood what I meant by supreme law of the land. I'm referring to the Constitution, NOT normal federal laws. Therefore, my point stands, and in fact that's what the Constitution is, by any interpretation.
137 posted on
06/26/2003 10:48:37 PM PDT by
Skywalk
To: Skywalk
I'm referring to the Constitution, NOT normal federal laws. Therefore, my point stands, and in fact that's what the Constitution is, by any interpretation. And that begs the next question. Exactly how does the Constitution permit the courts to exercise power in the sodomy case, namely where do they get this so-called right of "privacy" from?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson